Paper Type |
: |
Research Paper |
Title |
: |
Households Willingness to Pay for Improved Waste Management
In Silchar Municipal Area: A Case Study In Cachar District,
Assam. |
Country |
: |
India |
Authors |
: |
Ashish Taru Roy, Uttam Deb |
 |
: |
10.9790/0837-0652131  |
Abstract:This paper investigates the willingness to pay for an improved waste management in Silchar
municipal area under Cachar district in Assam. On an average, 63% of the households are willing to pay for
improved waste management. It is therefore apparent that Silchar residents in general regard waste
management as an environmental service as they are willing to pay for its provision. An open ended contingent
valuation method was used to elicit households' willingness to pay for waste management. We used a multiple
regression model to establish the determinants of willingness to pay. The multiple regression estimates revealed
that those with a higher expenditure (proxy of income) are willing to pay for an improved waste management.
This finding corroborates the environmental economic theory which assumes that the demand for an improved
environmental quality increases with income. More aware the person the more they are willing to pay for
improved waste management. Larger families are willing to pay for an improved provision of waste
management services. Also, educated people are more willing to pay for improvement. Also the presence of
working woman in the family does influence the willingness to pay.
Keywords: Contingent Valuation Method, Environmental service, Multiple regression model, Waste
management, Willingness to Pay.
[1] Pearce, D., Economic values and the natural world (Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, 1993).
[2] Willis, K.G., and Corkindale, J.T., Environment valuation, new perspectives (CAB International, Oxon, 1995).
[3] Pearce, D.W., and Turner, R.K., Economics of natural resources and environment (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 1990).
[4] Hanemann, W.M., Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? American Economic Review, 81(3),
1991, 635-647.
[5] Mitchell, R. and Carson, R., Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method, (John Hopkins Press, Baltimore,
1989).
[6] Pearce, D.W., and Turner, R.K., Economics of natural resources and environment (Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 1990).
[7] Jimson, L.S, Valuation of solid waste removal services in northern Lesotho: contingent valuation approach, Unpublished, M.A.
Dissertation, Dept. of Economics, University of Botswana, 2001.
[8] Niringiye, A. and Douglas, O.G., Determinants of willingness to pay for solid waste management in Kampala city, Current Research
Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 2010, 119-122.
[9] Yusuf, S.A., K.K. Salimonu and O.T.Ojo, Determinants of willingness to pay for improved household solid waste management in
Oyo state, Nigeria, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(3), 2007, 233-239.
[10] Das, S. and K. Gogoi , Municipal solid waste management in India: a study of Tinsukia municipality of Assam in India, (VDM
Verlag Dr. Muller Gmbh & Co. KG, Germany, 2010).