Abstract: Strategy is important to win the war in army. Every army has two major divisions as infantry and artillery. Artillery is dependent on the armored vehicles such as tanks, missile carriers and trucks. The movement of armored vehicles has vital importance in war to win. In order to cross the obstacles such as rivers, canals army has to build arrangement which will be quicker and faster to construct the bridge. These kinds of quickly constructed bridges are known as Heavy Assault Bridge. Its job is to allow armored units to cross the obstacles. The Heavy Assault bridge is rated for normal crossings of military load classification of 60 tons. Centre Pin Joint is placed between modules of the girders in a single bridge span. The maximum stresses will develop at centre pin joint only. Before failure of bridge centre pin joint will fail. So proper centre pin design is the main criteria. The objective of this project is to perform a failure analysis of the centre pin joint used in heavy assault bridge. So it is very important to determine high-stress areas of concern and to increase its load carrying capacity by design modification. As previously centre pin joint is replaced by modified pin joint, its load carrying capacity will be enhanced. Riveting of pin would be eliminated. Finally, conclusions based on the results and recommendations which can be extensions of this project are also presented.
Keywords - Heavy assault bridge, Centre pin joint, Ansys..
[1] Department of the Army, 1990,"TM5-5420-203, Technical Manual: Operator's Unit, Direct Support and General Support Maintenance for Bridge, Armored Vehicle Launched: Scissoring Type: Class 60 and Class 70 Aluminium; 60 Foot Span; For M48A5 and M60 Launcher, MLC60 and MLC70," Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C.
[2] Choi, Jeong-Hoon, 2000,"The Fracture Analysis and Remaining Life Estimation of the HAB Sub-Components," Master Thesis submitted to West Virginia University 5. Lewis R., 1987, "Production line applications of automated NDT systems," IEE.
[3] H.V.S. Ganga Rao, P. Klinkhachorn, U.B. Halabe, R.H.L. Chen, R. Kalluri, Alluri, E.S. Sazonov and J.H. Choi, "Damage and remaining life assessment for AVLB", Constructed Facilities Centre, West Virginia University, 2001, Submitted to U.S. Army Tank-Automotive and Armament Command Acquisition Center , U.S. Army grant DAAE07-96-C-x226.
[4] Krason W. and Filiks L., Rigid and deformable models in the numerical strength test of Scissor Bridge.
[5] Dacko M., Krason W. and Filiks L., Experimental and numerical testing of the modernized BLG-67 Bridge.
[6] Reference manual, ANSYS, Version 12.
[7] Sienkiewicz O.C. and Taylor R.L., The Finite Element Method, Vol.1: The Basis, fifth edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2000.
[8] Ministry of National Defense in India: Military Bridges, Manual, published by DRDO.
[9] Operational Manual: Trilateral design and test code for military bridging and gap-crossing equipment, Publisher in the United States, 1996.
[10] Indian Heavy Assault Bridge Kartik.