Paper Type |
: |
Research Paper |
Title |
: |
Reproductive parameters in Holstein dairy cows treated with three resynchronization methods |
Country |
: |
Iran |
Authors |
: |
Nasroallah Moradi kor || Kaveh Mohammadi Khanghah || Mona Ghasemi |
 |
: |
10.9790/3008-0133943  |
Abstract: The objective of the present study was to determine the reproductive parameters in Holstein cows treated by different hormonal protocols during insemination and postpartum periods. The 114 dairy cows (multiparous) with BCS between 2.75 and 3 were divided into 3 groups in a completely randomized design. 38 cows were treated by Heatsynch method + eCG (M1), 38 cows received Ovsynch + CIDR (M2) and 38 cows were subjected to the Heatsynch method (M3). Blood samples were taken to determine progesterone plasma contents in 14, 21 and 24 days after first insemination. Results showed that treatment with M2 protocol significantly decreased days to first service and conception rate in the cows (P < 0.05). First service conception rate in cows treated with M1 protocol was higher (P < 0.05) compared to M2 and M3 protocol. Pregnancy rate in M1was significantly higher than that of the other groups (P ≤ 0.05). This difference could be due to equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) which could have an effective function on ovulation, fertilization and embryo's vitality. Plasma progesterone levels of pregnant cows were higher than that of nonpregnants cows regardless the type of resynchronization protocols (P≤0.05). However, activation of ovaries, reinitiate estrous cycle and accordance between estrous and ovulation were increased when dairy cows subjected to the Heatsynch + eCG method (M1). Thus, M2 protocol is recommended for primiparous but not for multiparous cows, and T3 protocol is not recommended for synchronization.
Key words : Progesterone, Reproductive indices, CIDR, Dairy cattle, eCG
[1] Bartolome JA, Sheerı´n P, Luznar S, Mele´ndez P, Kelbert D, Risco CA, Thatcher WW., 2002. Conception rate in lactating dairy cows using Ovsynch after presynchronization with prostaglandin F2a (PGF 2a) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). The Bovine Practitioner;36:35–9.16.
[2] Benmrad, M. & Stevenson, J. S., 1985. Gonadotrophin releasing hormone and prostaglandin F2α for post partum dairy cows; oestrus, ovulation and fertility traits. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 800–11.
[3] Chebel R, Santos JEP, Cerri RLA, Juchem S, Galvao KN, Thatcher WW., 2003. Effect of resynchronization with GnRH on day 21 after artificial insemination on pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology;60:1389–99.
[4] Dailey, R. A., R. E. James, E. K. Inskeep, and S. P. Washburn. 1983. Synchronization of estrus in dairy heifers with prostaglandin F2αwith or without estradiol benzoate. J. Dairy Sci. 66:881–886.
[5] DeJarnette JM, Marshall CE., 2003. Effects of pre-synchronization using combinations PGF2a, and (or) GnRH on pregnancy rates of Ovsynch- and Cosynch-treated lactating Holstein cows. Anim Reprod Sci;77:51–60.
[6] Dizerega, G. S., and G. D. Hodgen. 1981. Luteal phase dysfunction infertility: A sequel to aberrant folliculogenesis. Fertil. Steril. 35:489–499.
[7] Erb, R. E., H. A. Garverick, R. D. Randel, B. L. Brown, and C. J. Callahan. 1976. Profiles of reproductive hormones associated with fertile and non-fertile inseminations of dairy cows. Theriogenology 5:227–242.
[8] Fogwell, R. L., B. M. Kanyima, A. Villa-Godoy, W. J. Enright, and J. J. Ireland. 1986. Enhanced precision of estrus and luteinizing hormone after progesterone and prostaglandin in heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2179–2185.
[9] Folman, Y., M. Kaim, Z. Herz, and M. Rosenberg. 1990. Comparison of methods for the synchronization of estrous cycles in dairy cows. 2. Effects of progesterone and parity on conception. J. Dairy Sci. 73:2817–2825.
[10] Fonseca, F. A., J. H. Britt, B. T. McDaniel, J. C. Wilk, and A. H. Rakes. 1983. Reproductive traits of Holsteins and Jerseys. Effects of age, milk yield, and clinical abnormalities on involution of cervix and uterus, ovulation, estrous cycles, detection of estrus, conception rate, and days open. J. Dairy Sci. 66:1128–1147.