Series-1 (Nov. – Dec. 2019)Nov - Dec 2019 Issue Statistics
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: Angiospermic plants have been observed to be adversely affected by certain plant parasites like Cuscuta spp. Consequent to their invasion into host plants, a variety of physiological, biochemical and molecular biological alterations occur, and therefore affect the quality as well as quantity of yield from angiospermic plants. The present article embodies an overview of angiosperm plants in reference to host- parasite interaction with Cuscuta spp, and collectively may provide new insights into developing biochemical as well as molecular biological strategies for expressing solutions for certain problems concerning with agricultural perturbation of crop yield.
Key Words: Angiosperm plants; Cuscuta spp; host- parasite interaction
[1]. Alakonya A, Kumar R, Koenig D, Kimura S, Townsley B, Runo S, Garces HM, Kang J, Yanez A, David-Schwartz R, Machuka J, Sinha N. 2012. Interspecific RNA interference of shoot meristemless-like disrupts Cuscuta pentagona plant parasitism. The Plant Cell 24: 3153-3166.
[2]. Alam MM, Begum F, Roy P. 2014. Yield and yield attributes of rapeseed-mustard (Brassica). Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 39 (2): 311-336.
[3]. Albert M, Werner M, Proksch P, Fry SC, Kaldenhoff R. 2004. The cell wall-modifying xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase LeXTH1 is expressed during the defence reaction of tomato against the plant parasite Cuscuta reflexa. Plant Biology 6: 402-407.
[4]. Albert M, Belastegui-Macadam X, Kaldenhoff R. 2006. An attack of the plant parasite Cuscuta reflexa induces the expression of attAGP, an attachment protein of the host tomato. The Plant Journal 48: 548-556
[5]. Albert M, van der Krol S, Kaldenhoff R. 2010. Cuscuta reflexa invasion induces Ca release in its host. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 12 (3): 554-557.
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: Enzymology studies are essential mediators to comprehend the complex reactions that occur in the domain of biology. Β-amylase EC (3.2.1.2) is employed popularly in the brewing industry and its new applications are ever so growing. β-amylase (an exoamylase) can employ starch, glycogen and oligosaccharides as substrate and hydrolyze their alpha-D-glucosidic linkages yielding maltose units as reaction output. Sources of. Β-amylase range from simple microorganisms to higher plants: Dragon fruit was screened for presence of Β-amylase and gave positive results for the same. Furthermore, optimum pH and optimum temperature were determined as 4.8 pH units and 37degree Celsius respectively through experimentation. Various literature site instances defining the role of costus extract as an inhibitor of amylases and these claims were put to test.
Key Words: Red Dragonfruit, β-amylase, Costus igneus, Inhibitor
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3931203/
[2] Devi VD, Urooj A.: Hypoglycemic potential of Morus indica L and Costus igneus Nak – A preliminary study. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2008; 46(8): 614-616.
[3] Enzyme classification- BRENDA
[4] B.N. Joshi et al. / Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 436 (2013) 278–282
[5] Hammel, B. (2013). "Hylocereus costaricensis". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2013: e.T151841A567360..
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: Peach (Prunus persica L.), a member of the Rosaceae family, remains one of the most important fruit tree crops in temperate regions. The timing of flowering in peach is one of the most fundamental and complex developmental processes in the temperate areas. MADS-box family genes are essential transcription factors involved in plant development including growth terminal, bud formation, and endodormancy regulation in peach. Current understanding of the regulatory network(s) involved in dormancy induction is complicated. To understand the role of MADS-box genes orthologs in peach, we isolated and characterized nine transcription factors ″TFs‶including three DAM genes and six other ″TFs‶ involved in dormancy regulation. The expression profiles of these genes.......
Keywords: Prunus persica L.; MADS-box; RT-PCR; dormancy; bud formation.
[1]. Cooke, J. K., Eriksson, M. E. and Junttila, O. 2012. The dynamic nature of bud dormancy in trees: environmental control and molecular mechanisms. Plant Cell Environ, 35: 1707–1728.
[2]. Lang, G.A. 1987. Dormancy: a new terminology. Hort Science, 22: 817–820.
[3]. Alves, G., Gelain, J., Vidal, G.S., Nesi, C.N., Mio, L.L.M.D. and Biasi, L.A. 2018. Flowering period and fruit quality of peach trees selections and cultivars in the metropolitan region of Curitiba. RevistaBrasileira de Fruticultura, 40:(3).
[4]. Yamane, H. 2014. Regulation of bud dormancy and bud break in Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Siebold &Zucc.) and peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]: a summary of recent studies. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, CH-Rev4.
[5]. Rohde, A., Howe, G.T., Olsen, J.E., Moritz, T., Van Montagu, M., Junttila, O. and Boerjan, W. 2000. Molecular aspects of bud dormancy in trees. In Molecular biology of woody plants, Springer Dordrecht, 89-134..
