Abstract: The Condition factor (k) of the Clarias gariepinus species in Oluwa River, Nigeria was done. Samples were collected monthly over a two-year period from July 2010 to June 2012 and were identified using standard method. They were subjected to morphometric studies including determination weightand lengths. Condition factor was calculated in relation to sex and sizes. The mean condition factor for males exhibited a range of 0.81±0.03 – 1.97±0.33 (mean 1.34±0.10) while those of females exhibited a range of 0.64±0.00 – 2.00±0.21 (mean 1.31±0.09)and that for combined sexes ranged from 0.54±0.27 to 1.94±0.11 (mean 1.31±0.10). In relation to total length range (TLR), males had the highest condition factor at 34.00 – 36.90cm while the least was recorded in 70.00-72.90cm range. Females had the highest condition factor in the range 37.00-39.90cm and the least at range 70.00-72.90cm. For the combined sexes, highest condition factor was recorded in the TLR 37.00-39.90cm while the least was also recorded in the TLR 70.00-72.90cm.
1]. Aboaba, M.A., 1993. Reproduction, larval rearing and the influence of dietary protein on the growth of the catfish (Chryschthys nigrodigitatus). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
[2]. Abowei, J.F.N., 2009. The Morphology, Abundance, Condition Factor and Length-weight Relationship of Ethmalosa fimbriata (Bowdish 1825) from Nkoro River Niger Delta, Nigeria. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1(1), 51-56
[3]. Abowei, J.F.N., Davies, A.O., 2009. Some population parameters of Clarotes laticeps (Rupell, 1829) from the fresh water reaches of the lower river, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Am. J. Sci. Res., (2), 15-19.
[4]. Abowei, J.F.N., Davis, O.A., Eli, A.A., 2009. Study of the Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Five Fish Species from Nkoro River, Niger Delta, Nigeria. J. of Bio Sci1(3), 94-98.
[5]. Ael, E.V., Belpaire, C., Breine, J., Geeraerts, C., Van Thuyne, G., Eulaers, I., Blust, R., Bervoets, L., 2014. Are persistent organic pollutants and metals in eel muscle predictive for the ecological water quality? Environ. Pollut. 186, 165-171