Version-1 (Jan-Feb 2018)
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: This research was conducted to examine comparison between hardwood and softwood components. Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin are major constituents for both hardwood and softwood. Depending on these constituents wood's application varies. In this study we examined 10 important wood samples (5 are hardwoods & 5 are softwoods) which are mostly available in Bangladesh. The wood samples were tested in some standard chemical methods, whose samples were dewaxed and depectinised, then the lignin content was measured (mainly using H2SO4). After the removal of the lignin, two other mains components α-cellulose and hemicelluloses were measured. The average components values are 40-50% cellulose, 15-40% hemicelluloses and 18-25% lignin for hardwoods. On the other hand, the average components values are 40-45% cellulose, 24-37% hemicellulose and 25-30% lignin for softwoods.According to their lingo-cellulosic contents they can convert into various useful products. Also by these constituents of hardwood and softwood they may be useful for same or different purposes.
Key words: Softwood, Hardwood, Cellulose, Hemicellulose and Lignin.
[1]. Guangyu Yang and PirjoJaakkola, 2011.Wood chemistry and isolation of extractives from wood, Literature study for BIOTULI project, pp. 2-4.
[2]. Chen HZ. Ecological high value-added theory and application of crop straws. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2006.
[3]. Yang SH. Plant fiber chemistry. Beijing: China Light Industry Press; 2008.
[4]. H. Chen, 2014. Chemical Composition and Structure of Natural LignocelluloseBiotechnology of Lignocellulose: Theory and Practice, pp. 25-70.
[5]. Nishiyama, Yoshiharu; Langan, Paul; Chanzy, Henri (2002). "Crystal Structure and Hydrogen-Bonding System in Cellulose Iβ from Synchrotron X-ray and Neutron Fiber Diffraction".J. Am. Chem. Soc124 (31): 9074–82. doi:10.1021/ja0257319. PMID 12149011.
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: This study examines the seasonal variation and asses surface water quality of Sundarbans Mangrove Forest in Bangladesh. The statistical analysis ANOVA was used to explore the seasonal variations among three seasons.Water quality and seasonal variation were assessing by measured twelve physico-chemical parameters like Temperature, EC (Electrical Conductivity), pH, Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), Total Suspended Solid (TSS), Salinity, Total Alkalinity, Total Acidity, Free dissolved CO2, Dissolved Oxygen (DO), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen demand (COD). The values most of the water quality parameters indicate that the sundarbans aquatic habitat is at suitable range for aquatic species but have a little concern about Salinity values. During study timelow level of BOD and COD value indicates that the organic waste pollution was insignificant in the Sundarbans water. The statistical analysis ANOVA shows a significant seasonal variation among three seasons at 0.01 levels of significance.
Key words: Seasonal Variation, Water Quality, Habitat, Aquatic Biodiversity and Sundarbans Mangrove Forest..
[1]. E. Khan,The Bangladesh Sundarbans; Wildlife Trust of Bangladesh (WTB): Dhaka, Bangladesh,(2011) 168.
[2]. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. UNEP: Protected Areas Database,(2005). Available online: http://www.wcmc.org.uk/data/database/un_combo.html.
[3]. Integrated Resources Management Plans for the Sundarbans, Forest Department, Ministry of Environment and Forests: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1 (2010) 1–281.
[4]. C. Giri, J. Long, S. Abbas, R.M. Murali, F.M.Qamer, B. Pengra, D. Thau, Distribution and dynamics of mangrove forests of South Asia. J. Environ. Manage, 100 (2014) 1–11.
[5]. M. Spalding, M. Kainuma,L. Collins,World Atlas of Mangrove; Earth Scan Press: London, UK, (2010)..
- Citation
- Abstract
- Reference
- Full PDF
Abstract: Every research paper includes a method section. It is one of the most easily written section and still accounts for 30% of rejection rate (1).This paper aims to facilitate the writing of the method section by providing threemodels namely Matrix approach ,Pyramid approach ,Concept map/brain map and last but with a condensed and comprehensive account into all ten components of method via text and a Master flowchart and a brief illustrative view of methodology. Also to make the nature of writing easy and to facilitate a tailored approach that goes from general to specific ,a multiple number of questionnaires have been provided with a special emphasis on biomedical researchto tailor the need of a wide number of disciplines and subdisciplines of biomedical sciences and provide a quick checklist.
Key words: Research, method, methodology, shortcomings , models, biomedical research
[1]. Erdemir F. How to write a materials and methods section of a scientific article ? 2013;39(Supplement 1):10–5.
[2]. Ali J. Manuscript Rejection: Causes and Remedies. J Young Pharm [Internet]. 2010 Jan;2(1):3–6. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0975148310210026
[3]. Kallet RH, Faarc RRT. How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper. 2004;(2):1229–32.
[4]. Azevedo LF, Fonseca JA, Winck JC, Hespanhol V. How to write a scientific paper —– Writing the methods section Como escrever um artigo científico — Estruturac ¸ ão e redacc ¸ ão de métodos. 2011;17(5):232–8.
[5]. Methods T, Manual APAP, Methods T. Writing up the Methods Section
