Abstract : This paper solves the perpetual problem of Reimann's hypothesis that has remained unsolved till date and has intrigued scientists for ages, centuries. Concrete proof along with mathematical equations is used to show that the hypothesis is wrong and that the values and assumptions suggested by Reimann is incorrect.
[1]. Bombieri, Enrico (2000), The Riemann Hypothesis – Official Problem Description (PDF), Clay Mathematics Institute, Retrieved 2008-10-25 Reprinted In (Borwein Et Al. 2008).
[2]. Borwein, Peter; Choi, Stephen; Rooney, Brendan; Weirathmueller, Andrea, Eds. (2008), The Riemann Hypothesis: A Resource For The Afficionado And Virtuoso Alike, CMS Books In Mathematics, New York: Springer, Doi:10.1007/978-0-387-72126-2, ISBN 978-0-387-72125-5
[3]. Borwein, Peter; Ferguson, Ron; Mossinghoff, Michael J. (2008), "Sign Changes In Sums Of The Liouville Function", Mathematics Of Computation, 77 (263): 1681–1694, Bibcode:2008macom..77.1681B, Doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-08-02036-X, MR 2398787
[4]. Connes, Alain (2000), "Noncommutative Geometry And The Riemann Zeta Function", Mathematics: Frontiers And Perspectives, Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society, Pp. 35–54, MR 1754766
[5]. Connes, Alain (2016), "An Essay On The Riemann Hypothesis", In Nash, J. F.; Rassias, Michael (Eds.), Open Problems In Mathematics, New York: Springer, Pp. 225–257, Arxiv:1509.05576, Doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32162-2_5