Abstract: Purpose — This paper develops a conceptual explanation of how communicated human resource practices inform employer attractiveness, application intention, and employer advocacy among prospective applicants commonly classified as Generation Z. It addresses the distinction between finding an employer desirable and being willing to recommend it to others.
Design/methodology....
Keywords: employer branding, signaling theory, Generation Z, employer attractiveness, HR practices, application intention, employer advocacy, conceptual review
[1].
Ambler, T., & Barrow, S. (1996). The employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.1996.42
[2].
Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430410550754
[3].
Berthon, P., Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2005.11072912
[4].
Celani, A., & Singh, P. (2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111106093
[5].
Choudhary, S., & Joshi, R. (2025). Unveiling the power of employer branding: Enhancing talent retention through organizational advocacy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 17(4), 1093–1114. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-04-2024-0225
[6].
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419